tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5135517.post2046444481456004108..comments2023-11-05T03:54:44.710-08:00Comments on Making it stick.: Even More On The Web AgainPatrick Loganhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02088461489050417591noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5135517.post-29617265421283451612007-05-16T02:17:00.000-07:002007-05-16T02:17:00.000-07:00I think you've taken a different stance now than i...I think you've taken a different stance now than in your last post. At least, I'm more with you now, although I don't see Apollo/Flex as an as big advancement as you do. Nor do I think the browsers are as stale and difficult to develop for as you think. On those points, we can agree to disagree.<BR/><BR/>However, you don't state that Apollo/Flex are components of and on the web, which is what put me off in your last post. I'm glad we're making progress! :-)asbjornuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11117147483795790759noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5135517.post-65089648386632041002007-05-15T11:38:00.000-07:002007-05-15T11:38:00.000-07:00You missed the point of my WS-Deathstar comment | ...You missed the point of my WS-Deathstar comment | I did not phrase it well enuf.<BR/><BR/>I did not mean that Apollo et al were restricted to WS-* services. I meant it as an analogy: Apollo and (especially) Silverspoon aim at replacing the deployed infrastructure, when they cd have enhanced existing browsers instead (as apparently Mozilla intends to do).<BR/><BR/>I get your point that Apollo et al will push the envelope and force browser apps to compete. I think (but cannot prove) that they will: that smart startups will continue to use non-proprietary tech to make progress.Bob Haugenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17335067552590715443noreply@blogger.com