Carlos Scheidegger sent this proof which is better than my attempt at why -1 * -1 = 1...
The definition of multiplication for whole numbers is:
x * y = y + y + y + ... + y + y, where y appears x times.
Using this, it is easy to prove that, being (succ x) the successor of x,
if x * y = z, then (succ x) * y = z + y, and vice-versa.
By definition, 0 is the successor of -1. Also by definition,
0 * x = 0,
and so, 0 * -1 = 0.
(succ -1) * -1 = 0
(succ -1) * -1 = 1 + -1
Now, we apply the property:
(succ -1) * -1 = 1 + -1 ->
-1 * -1 = 1
----
This proof's only assumption is that -n + n = 0, which is easily
provable. (Very easy using peano arithmetic)
No comments:
Post a Comment